[maemo-community] Election process referendum
From: Dave Neary dneary at maemo.orgDate: Mon Feb 2 17:39:27 EET 2009
- Previous message: Election process referendum
- Next message: Election process referendum
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Graham, Graham Cobb wrote: > I obviously had exactly the opposite assumption from you: I had assumed that > in the absence of a proposal to the contrary, the same rules as last time > would be in place. The karma rule was explicitly waived last time, not removed. By fiat, I might add (me, as it happens). > ... the karma requirement, which was dropped after > protest the last time around, is being raised again at the last minute... > ... this new proposal to re-instate the 25-points rule ... > ...if the council is proposing to > re-instate the 25-points rule... > ...I am willing to consider a suggestion to re-instate the 25-point > rule... Nice (albeit incorrect) framing & repetition. The 25 point rule is not being reinstated, it was waived last time. Not the same thing. > Karma has moved from just measuring developer contribution to a wider measure > of contribution to the Maemo community. That certainly makes it more > suitable to use as a basis than it was, but it still effectively excludes > users of the Maemo community (consumers rather than contributors). Maybe > that is the way it should be: maybe the council **should** represent > contributors rather than users, but we should at least get the opinion of the > users on whether they care. I did some tests on the voting data last year - of people who had a karma of 3 (that is, 9000 people who created a maemo.org account, and never did anything else) the vast majority (I don't have exact figures, but it was over 95% - I can work them out again if people are interested) didn't vote. For those worried that their vote wasn't secret, let me reassure you - I can get one binary piece of information from the database, voted or didn't vote. Like the election register. And my perception of the council was exactly what Graham says here: it is supposed to represent contributors, not users. Cheers, Dave. -- maemo.org docsmaster Email: dneary at maemo.org Jabber: bolsh at jabber.org
- Previous message: Election process referendum
- Next message: Election process referendum
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]