[maemo-community] Why not release the new site
From: Andrew Flegg andrew at bleb.orgDate: Thu Feb 26 19:28:08 EET 2009
- Previous message: Why not release the new site
- Next message: Copyright (was Re: Why not release the new site)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:22 PM, gary liquid <liquid at gmail.com> wrote: > > it would be wrong to attribute copyright span from before the entity > exists to assign copyright to. > > any works created between 2002 and 2008 (ie prior to autonomy of the maemo > community) still be under Nokias copyright. Not necessarily. I actually *has* the copyright to, say, `Uploading to Extras' in the wiki. The page footer *claimed* that Nokia had copyright, but is it actually clear they had any right to that claim (and I'm sure Nokia's lawyers were not aware they were making such claims on maemo.org)? > Unless everything is fully clarified and replaced any derivitive works are > still under the copyright control of the creator (Nokia). Nokia's the creator of the SDK & reference documentation (moving to maemo.nokia.com - at some point), not the creator of the wiki content, the downloads.maemo.org blurb, the posts on news/planet etc. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/ Maemo Community Council member
- Previous message: Why not release the new site
- Next message: Copyright (was Re: Why not release the new site)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]