[maemo-community] Minutes of web design meeting, 13/1/2009
From: Andrew Flegg andrew at bleb.orgDate: Wed Jan 14 15:26:27 EET 2009
- Previous message: Minutes of web design meeting, 13/1/2009
- Next message: Minutes of web design meeting, 13/1/2009
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Quim Gil <quim.gil at nokia.com> wrote: > > ext Dave Neary wrote: >> why the forum would get a different treatment from say mailing >> lists, IRC, Bugzilla, or any of the other user forums we have. This is one of the reasons in my mockup[1] (sod the visual aspect), I was attempting to hide the underlying technologies and show where the users/developers/downloaders/news were clustering. So, intermingling showing segregated *content*, not different technologies. Does it really matter if the development community are active on "Qt becomes LGPL" on maemo-developers or the "Developers" section of ITT/talk? > Because internettablettalk.com has proven to be a very good entry point > to a community. Agreed. >> Also, I'll ask the question here while I'm at it: should Documentation >> get a top-menu billing on the front page? > > Not in my opinion, having a visible place for Developers is enough. Again, agreed (and if I said anything different, I was wrong). Initially I'd been pushing for this segregation based on the initial use cases and content, rather than technology (i.e. distinguishing wiki from static docs is fairly useless to most visitors). However, there *was* quite a bit of pushback on this in the initial IRC meeting, IIRC. HTH, Andrew [1] For reference, http://bleb.org/software/maemo/maemo-org_mockup.png -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/ Maemo Community Council member
- Previous message: Minutes of web design meeting, 13/1/2009
- Next message: Minutes of web design meeting, 13/1/2009
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]