[maemo-community] Summit hotel room allocation & management
From: Dave Neary dneary at maemo.orgDate: Tue Sep 29 11:53:03 EEST 2009
- Previous message: Summit hotel room allocation & management
- Next message: Summit hotel room allocation & management
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, I would say unbooking some rooms is best. It's clear we're not going to fill 70 rooms, and I think you could safely unreserve 80% of what is currently empty, and still have some margin for fitting people in at the last minute. Cheers, Dave. Quim Gil wrote: > > ext Andrew Flegg wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 13:45, Sanjeev (EIPI) >> <mobiletabletsblog at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Do I add my name to the "Who needs a room?" section as well, like some >>> have done? Or just to the "Shared Room Allocations" section? >> "Shared Room Allocations" is definitive AFAIK. However, anyone who >> puts themselves as "Single/Shared" in the "Who Needs A Room?" may be >> auto-allocated into the list below. > > There are many rooms left. Either we sponsor more people only for > accommodation (budget for travel is allocated already) or we un-book > several rooms or a combination or both. > > What should we do? This is urgent since the worst scenario we must avoid > is paying for unused rooms. > > Some of you might be thinking about moving people to the empty rooms so > we have most people using a room alone. The price of the double room is > ok for 2 people but is almost luxury for one alone. I believe Nokia VPs > would be paying less for their **** rooms. :) > -- maemo.org docsmaster Email: dneary at maemo.org Jabber: bolsh at jabber.org
- Previous message: Summit hotel room allocation & management
- Next message: Summit hotel room allocation & management
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]