[maemo-community] Periodic cleanup of Extras-Devel?
From: Graham Cobb g+770 at cobb.uk.netDate: Tue Jan 19 02:01:54 EET 2010
- Previous message: Periodic cleanup of Extras-Devel?
- Next message: Periodic cleanup of Extras-Devel?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thursday 14 January 2010 19:13:33 Thomas Waelti wrote: > (I don't know if this rather be on maemo-develop or community) The discussion needs to move to -developers before any actions are taken. Many developers do not read -community. > What do you guys think about a periodic (automated?) cleanup of the > extras-devel repository? IMHO something like 60 days should be enough, then > a package shall either be promoted or updated. I disagree. I don't see -devel as just a temporary repository for things which will either be promoted or updated. I see it as also a semi-permanent repository for things which are either not good enough or don't have enough community interest to be promoted. If I create a niche application that (literally) less than 10 people in the world will use (I have one of these -- it works with a website that my friends and I use for managing joint holidays and other things) why shouldn't I put it in extras-devel and leave it there for my, and my friends', convenience? Otherwise I have to create a private repository to put it in. Same for an app I might create for a local group or a small company. Or, if I partially implement something which never reaches the stage of being good enough for anyone else to use, but where the code might be useful for someone else in the future, why shouldn't it be in extras-devel where someone can re-use it or even take it over? Particularly if the interesting part of the code has been put in a library. And 60 days might seem like a long time to some people on this list but for others of us it is nothing! I was away travelling on business for the whole of the last three months of last year -- the few weekends I spent in the UK were spent with my wife, not hacking, so nothing happened on **any** of my projects for at least 90 days! 1 year is a more reasonable measure of inactivity. A real example is something like my tinc package in earlier Maemo releases. There are very few people in the world who use tinc and only a small number use it on Maemo. I would not want to promote it to extras because it is not something that people should stumble on and try to use. But I do want it available for the small number of people who use tinc (who are all reasonably technical or can follow careful instructions). I do agree with removing obsolete versions from extras-devel, however. And I wouldn't object to an email to a maintainer to remind them of a package which has not changed for a year. Graham
- Previous message: Periodic cleanup of Extras-Devel?
- Next message: Periodic cleanup of Extras-Devel?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]