[maemo-community] Good bye!

[From: twilight312 at gmail.com]

Thanks for wise words.

What surprised me most, was INABT reaction to his loss - of course, I talk about unpleasant surprise - but, I don't want to do "bashing on already dead horse".

/Estel

On wto 26 cze 2012 08:41:42 CEST, Jed <jedi.theone at gmail.com> wrote:

> You clearly didn't follow all the threads, this was discussed in-depth. 
> Everyone agreed they should be allowed to partake too.
> Re-read the criteria, whoever was deemed to have made the biggest 
> contribution were to be granted a CA.
> That did not EXCLUDE people who contributed through coding efforts.
> Generally such efforts have the biggest impact & require far more 
> effort/skill/time.
> So it's only logical that more of such contributors would win out over 
> other community contributors.
> I was disappointed that I didn't win, but I know my contributions 
> haven't had anywhere near the impact that others on the list have had.
> Have an honest look at yourself, can you honestly say the opposite?
> I noticed INABT didn't make the cut, that was very surprising.
> But the competition was so tight, there was always going to be some 
> deserving users who missed out.
> 
> On 26/06/12 4:21 PM, claude bucher wrote:
> > there is absolutely nothing to be amused about here
> > and i'm not talking about Micheal's disappointment not getting a
> > device, as much as it put his "hitting a brick wall" statement in a
> > questionable light; wouldn't have minded keeping a brick i guess...
> > 
> > what may frustrate Micheal (and others, most likely, even thought the
> > CA winner list thread must already have debated this ad nauseam....)
> > is the fact that several if not all members of the Council won a N950;
> > a couple thoughts about this
> > no matter what personal likes or dislikes one may have for each of the
> > current Council member, they all made considerable contributions to the
> > Community and their being in the Council is but the most recent one (!)
> > what is maybe more questionable is that many of the CA devices were
> > granted on base of... missed coding competition opportunities, to put
> > it bluntly.
> > is this what this community is all about? coding?
> > if that's the case, Micheal's statement appears under a different light
> > IF NOKIA decides to pull out of Maemo, more then coding is going to be
> > needed to save the community...
> > 
> > however this may be, nothing to be laughing about...
> > 
> > On 26 June 2012 06:43, Jed <jedi.theone at gmail.com
> > <mailto:jedi.theone at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > 
> > LOL....
> > 
> > 
> > On 26/06/12 2:25 PM, misterc wrote:
> > 
> > can't help noticing that a couple weeks ago you applied for a N9
> > from
> > the CA...
> > would winning one have changed your opinion on the "no future" idea?
> > 
> > On 26 June 2012 04:07, Michael Cronenworth [via maemo community
> > mailing
> > lists] <[hidden email]
> > </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=__node&node=7580208&i=0>>
> > 
> > wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > maemo-community mailing list
> > maemo-community at maemo.org
> > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> maemo-community mailing list
> maemo-community at maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-community/attachments/20120626/e61ac8f5/attachment.htm>