[maemo-community] Good bye!

[From: Jed]

Are you saying he reacted angrily?
In some ways I wouldn't blame him.

On 26/06/12 5:25 PM, twilight312 at gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks for wise words.
>
> What surprised me most, was INABT reaction to his loss - of course, I
> talk about unpleasant surprise - but, I don't want to do "bashing on
> already dead horse".
>
> /Estel
>
> On wto 26 cze 2012 08:41:42 CEST, Jed <jedi.theone at gmail.com
> <mailto:jedi.theone at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>  > You clearly didn't follow all the threads, this was discussed in-depth.
>  > Everyone agreed they should be allowed to partake too.
>  > Re-read the criteria, whoever was deemed to have made the biggest
>  > contribution were to be granted a CA.
>  > That did not EXCLUDE people who contributed through coding efforts.
>  > Generally such efforts have the biggest impact & require far more
>  > effort/skill/time.
>  > So it's only logical that more of such contributors would win out over
>  > other community contributors.
>  > I was disappointed that I didn't win, but I know my contributions
>  > haven't had anywhere near the impact that others on the list have had.
>  > Have an honest look at yourself, can you honestly say the opposite?
>  > I noticed INABT didn't make the cut, that was very surprising.
>  > But the competition was so tight, there was always going to be some
>  > deserving users who missed out.
>  >
>  > On 26/06/12 4:21 PM, claude bucher wrote:
>  > > there is absolutely nothing to be amused about here
>  > > and i'm not talking about Micheal's disappointment not getting a
>  > > device, as much as it put his "hitting a brick wall" statement in a
>  > > questionable light; wouldn't have minded keeping a brick i guess...
>  > >
>  > > what may frustrate Micheal (and others, most likely, even thought the
>  > > CA winner list thread must already have debated this ad nauseam....)
>  > > is the fact that several if not all members of the Council won a N950;
>  > > a couple thoughts about this
>  > > no matter what personal likes or dislikes one may have for each of the
>  > > current Council member, they all made considerable contributions to
> the
>  > > Community and their being in the Council is but the most recent one
> (!)
>  > > what is maybe more questionable is that many of the CA devices were
>  > > granted on base of... missed coding competition opportunities, to put
>  > > it bluntly.
>  > > is this what this community is all about? coding?
>  > > if that's the case, Micheal's statement appears under a different
> light
>  > > IF NOKIA decides to pull out of Maemo, more then coding is going to be
>  > > needed to save the community...
>  > >
>  > > however this may be, nothing to be laughing about...
>  > >
>  > > On 26 June 2012 06:43, Jed <jedi.theone at gmail.com
> <mailto:jedi.theone at gmail.com>
>  > > <mailto:jedi.theone at gmail.com>> wrote:
>  > >
>  > > LOL....
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > On 26/06/12 2:25 PM, misterc wrote:
>  > >
>  > > can't help noticing that a couple weeks ago you applied for a N9
>  > > from
>  > > the CA...
>  > > would winning one have changed your opinion on the "no future" idea?
>  > >
>  > > On 26 June 2012 04:07, Michael Cronenworth [via maemo community
>  > > mailing
>  > > lists] <[hidden email]
>  > > </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=__node&node=7580208&i=0>>
>  > >
>  > > wrote:
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > >
>  > > _______________________________________________
>  > > maemo-community mailing list
>  > > maemo-community at maemo.org <mailto:maemo-community at maemo.org>
>  > > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>  > >
>  >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > maemo-community mailing list
>  > maemo-community at maemo.org <mailto:maemo-community at maemo.org>
>  > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> maemo-community mailing list
> maemo-community at maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>