[maemo-community] Good bye!

[From: Jed]

whatever man, you finished whining yet.

On 26/06/12 5:44 PM, claude bucher wrote:
> Piotr.,
>
> don't mention it ;)
>
> as to INABT...
> Pierre Coubertin, the "father" of the modern olympic games once said...
> «seeking record is as bad for the body as for the soul; it wears out the
> body and cripples the soul.»
> if a member of the Community was only seeking a device, he probably lost
> "the soul", no?
>
> On 26 June 2012 09:25, twilight312 at gmail.com
> <mailto:twilight312 at gmail.com> <twilight312 at gmail.com
> <mailto:twilight312 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     __
>
>     Thanks for wise words.
>
>     What surprised me most, was INABT reaction to his loss - of course,
>     I talk about unpleasant surprise - but, I don't want to do "bashing
>     on already dead horse".
>
>     /Estel
>
>
>     On wto 26 cze 2012 08:41:42 CEST, Jed <jedi.theone at gmail.com
>     <mailto:jedi.theone at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>      > You clearly didn't follow all the threads, this was discussed
>     in-depth.
>      > Everyone agreed they should be allowed to partake too.
>      > Re-read the criteria, whoever was deemed to have made the biggest
>      > contribution were to be granted a CA.
>      > That did not EXCLUDE people who contributed through coding efforts.
>      > Generally such efforts have the biggest impact & require far more
>      > effort/skill/time.
>      > So it's only logical that more of such contributors would win out
>     over
>      > other community contributors.
>      > I was disappointed that I didn't win, but I know my contributions
>      > haven't had anywhere near the impact that others on the list have
>     had.
>      > Have an honest look at yourself, can you honestly say the opposite?
>      > I noticed INABT didn't make the cut, that was very surprising.
>      > But the competition was so tight, there was always going to be some
>      > deserving users who missed out.
>      >
>      > On 26/06/12 4:21 PM, claude bucher wrote:
>      > > there is absolutely nothing to be amused about here
>      > > and i'm not talking about Micheal's disappointment not getting a
>      > > device, as much as it put his "hitting a brick wall" statement
>     in a
>      > > questionable light; wouldn't have minded keeping a brick i
>     guess...
>      > >
>      > > what may frustrate Micheal (and others, most likely, even
>     thought the
>      > > CA winner list thread must already have debated this ad
>     nauseam....)
>      > > is the fact that several if not all members of the Council won
>     a N950;
>      > > a couple thoughts about this
>      > > no matter what personal likes or dislikes one may have for each
>     of the
>      > > current Council member, they all made considerable
>     contributions to the
>      > > Community and their being in the Council is but the most recent
>     one (!)
>      > > what is maybe more questionable is that many of the CA devices
>     were
>      > > granted on base of... missed coding competition opportunities,
>     to put
>      > > it bluntly.
>      > > is this what this community is all about? coding?
>      > > if that's the case, Micheal's statement appears under a
>     different light
>      > > IF NOKIA decides to pull out of Maemo, more then coding is
>     going to be
>      > > needed to save the community...
>      > >
>      > > however this may be, nothing to be laughing about...
>      > >
>      > > On 26 June 2012 06:43, Jed <jedi.theone at gmail.com
>     <mailto:jedi.theone at gmail.com>
>      > > <mailto:jedi.theone at gmail.com>> wrote:
>      > >
>      > > LOL....
>      > >
>      > >
>      > > On 26/06/12 2:25 PM, misterc wrote:
>      > >
>      > > can't help noticing that a couple weeks ago you applied for a N9
>      > > from
>      > > the CA...
>      > > would winning one have changed your opinion on the "no future"
>     idea?
>      > >
>      > > On 26 June 2012 04:07, Michael Cronenworth [via maemo community
>      > > mailing
>      > > lists] <[hidden email]
>      > > </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=__node&node=7580208&i=0>>
>      > >
>      > > wrote:
>      > >
>      > >
>      > >
>      > >
>      > > _______________________________________________
>      > > maemo-community mailing list
>      > > maemo-community at maemo.org <mailto:maemo-community at maemo.org>
>      > > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>      > >
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > maemo-community mailing list
>      > maemo-community at maemo.org <mailto:maemo-community at maemo.org>
>      > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     maemo-community mailing list
>     maemo-community at maemo.org <mailto:maemo-community at maemo.org>
>     https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> maemo-community mailing list
> maemo-community at maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>