[maemo-community] Good bye!

[From: Jed]

This from w00t of all people?
Agreed with the sentiments/point though.

On 26/06/12 5:50 PM, Paul Sleggs wrote:
> Guys please be fair.  Enough of this bashing.  Everyone was doing what
> they were doing before the CA was announced.  In times like these when
> an antagonist serves a rage ball and this ball is on your side of the
> net as it where.  It is best to stop playing the game. Let them have a
> win and have the final say.
>
>
> On 26/06/2012 08:44, claude bucher wrote:
>> Piotr.,
>>
>> don't mention it ;)
>>
>> as to INABT...
>> Pierre Coubertin, the "father" of the modern olympic games once said...
>> «seeking record is as bad for the body as for the soul; it wears out
>> the body and cripples the soul.»
>> if a member of the Community was only seeking a device, he probably
>> lost "the soul", no?
>>
>> On 26 June 2012 09:25, twilight312 at gmail.com
>> <mailto:twilight312 at gmail.com> <twilight312 at gmail.com
>> <mailto:twilight312 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Thanks for wise words.
>>
>>     What surprised me most, was INABT reaction to his loss - of
>>     course, I talk about unpleasant surprise - but, I don't want to do
>>     "bashing on already dead horse".
>>
>>     /Estel
>>
>>
>>     On wto 26 cze 2012 08:41:42 CEST, Jed <jedi.theone at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:jedi.theone at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     > You clearly didn't follow all the threads, this was discussed
>>     in-depth.
>>     > Everyone agreed they should be allowed to partake too.
>>     > Re-read the criteria, whoever was deemed to have made the biggest
>>     > contribution were to be granted a CA.
>>     > That did not EXCLUDE people who contributed through coding efforts.
>>     > Generally such efforts have the biggest impact & require far more
>>     > effort/skill/time.
>>     > So it's only logical that more of such contributors would win
>>     out over
>>     > other community contributors.
>>     > I was disappointed that I didn't win, but I know my contributions
>>     > haven't had anywhere near the impact that others on the list
>>     have had.
>>     > Have an honest look at yourself, can you honestly say the opposite?
>>     > I noticed INABT didn't make the cut, that was very surprising.
>>     > But the competition was so tight, there was always going to be some
>>     > deserving users who missed out.
>>     >
>>     > On 26/06/12 4:21 PM, claude bucher wrote:
>>     > > there is absolutely nothing to be amused about here
>>     > > and i'm not talking about Micheal's disappointment not getting a
>>     > > device, as much as it put his "hitting a brick wall" statement
>>     in a
>>     > > questionable light; wouldn't have minded keeping a brick i
>>     guess...
>>     > >
>>     > > what may frustrate Micheal (and others, most likely, even
>>     thought the
>>     > > CA winner list thread must already have debated this ad
>>     nauseam....)
>>     > > is the fact that several if not all members of the Council won
>>     a N950;
>>     > > a couple thoughts about this
>>     > > no matter what personal likes or dislikes one may have for
>>     each of the
>>     > > current Council member, they all made considerable
>>     contributions to the
>>     > > Community and their being in the Council is but the most
>>     recent one (!)
>>     > > what is maybe more questionable is that many of the CA devices
>>     were
>>     > > granted on base of... missed coding competition opportunities,
>>     to put
>>     > > it bluntly.
>>     > > is this what this community is all about? coding?
>>     > > if that's the case, Micheal's statement appears under a
>>     different light
>>     > > IF NOKIA decides to pull out of Maemo, more then coding is
>>     going to be
>>     > > needed to save the community...
>>     > >
>>     > > however this may be, nothing to be laughing about...
>>     > >
>>     > > On 26 June 2012 06:43, Jed <jedi.theone at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:jedi.theone at gmail.com>
>>     > > <mailto:jedi.theone at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>     > >
>>     > > LOL....
>>     > >
>>     > >
>>     > > On 26/06/12 2:25 PM, misterc wrote:
>>     > >
>>     > > can't help noticing that a couple weeks ago you applied for a N9
>>     > > from
>>     > > the CA...
>>     > > would winning one have changed your opinion on the "no future"
>>     idea?
>>     > >
>>     > > On 26 June 2012 04:07, Michael Cronenworth [via maemo community
>>     > > mailing
>>     > > lists] <[hidden email]
>>     > > </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=__node&node=7580208&i=0>>
>>     > >
>>     > > wrote:
>>     > >
>>     > >
>>     > >
>>     > >
>>     > > _______________________________________________
>>     > > maemo-community mailing list
>>     > > maemo-community at maemo.org <mailto:maemo-community at maemo.org>
>>     > > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>>     > >
>>     >
>>     > _______________________________________________
>>     > maemo-community mailing list
>>     > maemo-community at maemo.org <mailto:maemo-community at maemo.org>
>>     > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     maemo-community mailing list
>>     maemo-community at maemo.org <mailto:maemo-community at maemo.org>
>>     https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> maemo-community mailing list
>> maemo-community at maemo.org
>> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> maemo-community mailing list
> maemo-community at maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>