[maemo-community] Good bye!

[From: Paul Sleggs]

Guys please be fair.  Enough of this bashing.  Everyone was doing what 
they were doing before the CA was announced.  In times like these when 
an antagonist serves a rage ball and this ball is on your side of the 
net as it where.  It is best to stop playing the game. Let them have a 
win and have the final say.


On 26/06/2012 08:44, claude bucher wrote:
> Piotr.,
>
> don't mention it ;)
>
> as to INABT...
> Pierre Coubertin, the "father" of the modern olympic games once said...
> «seeking record is as bad for the body as for the soul; it wears out 
> the body and cripples the soul.»
> if a member of the Community was only seeking a device, he probably 
> lost "the soul", no?
>
> On 26 June 2012 09:25, twilight312 at gmail.com 
> <mailto:twilight312 at gmail.com> <twilight312 at gmail.com 
> <mailto:twilight312 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Thanks for wise words.
>
>     What surprised me most, was INABT reaction to his loss - of
>     course, I talk about unpleasant surprise - but, I don't want to do
>     "bashing on already dead horse".
>
>     /Estel
>
>
>     On wto 26 cze 2012 08:41:42 CEST, Jed <jedi.theone at gmail.com
>     <mailto:jedi.theone at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     > You clearly didn't follow all the threads, this was discussed
>     in-depth.
>     > Everyone agreed they should be allowed to partake too.
>     > Re-read the criteria, whoever was deemed to have made the biggest
>     > contribution were to be granted a CA.
>     > That did not EXCLUDE people who contributed through coding efforts.
>     > Generally such efforts have the biggest impact & require far more
>     > effort/skill/time.
>     > So it's only logical that more of such contributors would win
>     out over
>     > other community contributors.
>     > I was disappointed that I didn't win, but I know my contributions
>     > haven't had anywhere near the impact that others on the list
>     have had.
>     > Have an honest look at yourself, can you honestly say the opposite?
>     > I noticed INABT didn't make the cut, that was very surprising.
>     > But the competition was so tight, there was always going to be some
>     > deserving users who missed out.
>     >
>     > On 26/06/12 4:21 PM, claude bucher wrote:
>     > > there is absolutely nothing to be amused about here
>     > > and i'm not talking about Micheal's disappointment not getting a
>     > > device, as much as it put his "hitting a brick wall" statement
>     in a
>     > > questionable light; wouldn't have minded keeping a brick i
>     guess...
>     > >
>     > > what may frustrate Micheal (and others, most likely, even
>     thought the
>     > > CA winner list thread must already have debated this ad
>     nauseam....)
>     > > is the fact that several if not all members of the Council won
>     a N950;
>     > > a couple thoughts about this
>     > > no matter what personal likes or dislikes one may have for
>     each of the
>     > > current Council member, they all made considerable
>     contributions to the
>     > > Community and their being in the Council is but the most
>     recent one (!)
>     > > what is maybe more questionable is that many of the CA devices
>     were
>     > > granted on base of... missed coding competition opportunities,
>     to put
>     > > it bluntly.
>     > > is this what this community is all about? coding?
>     > > if that's the case, Micheal's statement appears under a
>     different light
>     > > IF NOKIA decides to pull out of Maemo, more then coding is
>     going to be
>     > > needed to save the community...
>     > >
>     > > however this may be, nothing to be laughing about...
>     > >
>     > > On 26 June 2012 06:43, Jed <jedi.theone at gmail.com
>     <mailto:jedi.theone at gmail.com>
>     > > <mailto:jedi.theone at gmail.com>> wrote:
>     > >
>     > > LOL....
>     > >
>     > >
>     > > On 26/06/12 2:25 PM, misterc wrote:
>     > >
>     > > can't help noticing that a couple weeks ago you applied for a N9
>     > > from
>     > > the CA...
>     > > would winning one have changed your opinion on the "no future"
>     idea?
>     > >
>     > > On 26 June 2012 04:07, Michael Cronenworth [via maemo community
>     > > mailing
>     > > lists] <[hidden email]
>     > > </user/SendEmail.jtp?type=__node&node=7580208&i=0>>
>     > >
>     > > wrote:
>     > >
>     > >
>     > >
>     > >
>     > > _______________________________________________
>     > > maemo-community mailing list
>     > > maemo-community at maemo.org <mailto:maemo-community at maemo.org>
>     > > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>     > >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > maemo-community mailing list
>     > maemo-community at maemo.org <mailto:maemo-community at maemo.org>
>     > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     maemo-community mailing list
>     maemo-community at maemo.org <mailto:maemo-community at maemo.org>
>     https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> maemo-community mailing list
> maemo-community at maemo.org
> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-community/attachments/20120626/33dd8e25/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: psleggs.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 121 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-community/attachments/20120626/33dd8e25/attachment.vcf>