[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] Why "hildon-lgpl"
From: Murray Cumming murrayc at murrayc.comDate: Fri Nov 11 11:35:30 EET 2005
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Why "hildon-lgpl"
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Why "hildon-lgpl"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> If you have ideas what kind of package / > library grouping would make sense, we're open for suggestions. At the moment it looks like hildon-libs, hildon-fm, and hildon-lgpl should all be in one tarball, but maybe there's some application/lib I don't know about that wouldn't need all of them. But it's not an important detail for most developers. I just want to make sure that the C++ stuff is as clear as possible without creating disadvantages. Murray Cumming murrayc at murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Why "hildon-lgpl"
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Why "hildon-lgpl"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]