[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] Why "hildon-lgpl"

From: Tommi Komulainen tommi.komulainen at nokia.com
Date: Fri Nov 11 17:36:58 EET 2005
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 10:35 +0100, ext Murray Cumming wrote:
> > If you have ideas what kind of package /
> > library grouping would make sense, we're open for suggestions.
> 
> At the moment it looks like hildon-libs, hildon-fm, and hildon-lgpl should
> all be in one tarball, but maybe there's some application/lib I don't know
> about that wouldn't need all of them.

One reason to keep hildon-fm separate is because it drags in quite a few
extra libraries that applications might not need. There are still a
couple of applications (for example Control Panel and Calculator) that
don't play with files, though most probably will.


> But it's not an important detail for most developers. I just want to make
> sure that the C++ stuff is as clear as possible without creating
> disadvantages.

Yeah, I agree. On the other hand I also hate the overly careful handling
of library dependencies (application ends up depending on every possible
library because there's a widget the application doesn't use but depends
on the next library, etc.)


-- 
Tommi Komulainen                            <tommi.komulainen at nokia.com>


More information about the maemo-developers mailing list