[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] Re: About Ubuntu installer import into Rosetta
From: A S Alam apbrar at gmail.comDate: Fri Mar 17 14:25:12 EET 2006
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Re: About Ubuntu installer import into Rosetta
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Re: About Ubuntu installer import into Rosetta
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ਸ਼ੁੱਕਰਵਾਰ 17 ਮਾਰਚ 2006 16:03 ਨੂੰ, Carlos Perelló Marín ਨੇ ਲਿਖਿਆ: > On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 15:34 +0530, A S Alam wrote: > [...] > > > > 3) Use pa at gurmukhi and pa at shahmukhi > > > > > > In both cases, the future Western Pnjabi translations will use "pnb" > > > (they'll need the locale for this...but anyway they will DO need a > > > locale) > > > > > > 1) is a bit complicated as it requires all projects to progressively > > > change. It is however more consistent in logn term with ISO 639-3 > > > > > > 2) is simpler but has the inconvenience of > > > possible political feelings hurted for PK people who could claim that > > > "pa" has been kinda "stolen" > > > > > > I don't favour 3) because the difference are actually not only in two > > > ways of writing the same language. > > > > but it is, Punjabi is SAME language but ONLY way to write is different. > > Then I think we should go for that option. That's what Serbian already > does. I don't know the political implications in this case, but Serbian > uses 'sr' as the locale for the main way to write it and sr at ije for the > other. > that will nice and I agree for this! > I can only say that it's Punjabi translators decision which option > should we get and, if possible a decision take from both sides. > > Amanpreet do you think that you would reach an agreement on this? > Thing is that there is only ONE Team exist, which is for Eastern Punjabi (our Team), no other translator yet start work for Western Punjabi. so, I don't think there will be need any agreement. regards > Cheers. > > > > As you see both my proposals actually need changing things in D-I > > > anyway..:-) > > > > regards > > > > > An alternative proposal is not changing anything...with the > > > inconvenience of not being able to handle D-I/Ubuntu installer > > > translations easily in Rosetta (well, given that Rosetta is not free > > > software, that's actually not my main concern....). -- A S Alam "Either find a way or make one"
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Re: About Ubuntu installer import into Rosetta
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Re: About Ubuntu installer import into Rosetta
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]