[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] Re: scratchbox installation
From: Luca Donaggio donaggio at gmail.comDate: Thu May 18 12:38:58 EEST 2006
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Re: scratchbox installation
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Re: scratchbox installation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2006/5/18, Devesh Kothari <devesh.kothari at nokia.com>: [skipped] > There has been on the mailing list people who have talked about SB 1.0 > and there are known cases of maemo rootstraps to work on SB 1.0 but > still we havnt officially moved to 1.0 because of above reasons. > > No body really has put in time to evaluate why to move to SB 1.0 > (especially since the 0.9.8.5 version works well for our needs, so there > is no great significant itch). > > I am not so upto date on all developments, but what would be the major > reason to move to SB 1.0 and what are the impacts if any ? > > Devesh One (very strong IMHO) reason could be that legacy scratchbox (0.9.8.xseries) doesn't work in a 64 bit environment. As all AMD systems sold today are 64 bit and more and more Linux distributions are released for 64 bit environments, I think that moving to the Scratchbox stable (1.0.x) series is becoming a priority (always IMHO of course !). I'm using Scratchbox 1.0.1 rc1 for x86_64 architecture (see http://www.rahkonen.org/projects.html) with the latest Maemo release and it seems to be working just fine. Luca Donaggio -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20060518/a1ff11a4/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Re: scratchbox installation
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Re: scratchbox installation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]