[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320

From: Kalle Vahlman kalle.vahlman at gmail.com
Date: Mon Jan 15 10:27:47 EET 2007
2007/1/15, klaus at rotters.de <klaus at rotters.de>:
> Am 13 Jan 2007 um 21:00 hat Kalle Vahlman geschrieben:
> > For the cairo audience there's the question of the tessellation
> > process, can it really be so fast on the PXA-320 or is there a bug
> > somewhere that twists the results? What could be so good in PXA-320
> > (or not-good on the other devices) that the results are so drastic?
> I didn't know that the N800 has a PXA-320 uC by Mravell.

It doesn't. I had three devices (plus my laptop) that I ran the test
on, 770, N800 and a PXA-320-based board.

> Has anyone more detailed information about the hardware used in the N800?

As mentioned in the blog entry, it's TI OMAP 2420. Also see:


Kalle Vahlman, zuh at iki.fi
Powered by http://movial.fi
Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi

More information about the maemo-developers mailing list