[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
From: Kalle Vahlman kalle.vahlman at gmail.comDate: Mon Jan 15 10:27:47 EET 2007
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2007/1/15, klaus at rotters.de <klaus at rotters.de>: > Am 13 Jan 2007 um 21:00 hat Kalle Vahlman geschrieben: > > For the cairo audience there's the question of the tessellation > > process, can it really be so fast on the PXA-320 or is there a bug > > somewhere that twists the results? What could be so good in PXA-320 > > (or not-good on the other devices) that the results are so drastic? > > I didn't know that the N800 has a PXA-320 uC by Mravell. It doesn't. I had three devices (plus my laptop) that I ran the test on, 770, N800 and a PXA-320-based board. > Has anyone more detailed information about the hardware used in the N800? As mentioned in the blog entry, it's TI OMAP 2420. Also see: http://maemo.org/faq/faq.html#faq-N10129 -- Kalle Vahlman, zuh at iki.fi Powered by http://movial.fi Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]