[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
From: klaus at rotters.de klaus at rotters.deDate: Mon Jan 15 11:03:48 EET 2007
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Re: [cairo] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am 15 Jan 2007 um 10:27 hat Kalle Vahlman geschrieben: > As mentioned in the blog entry, it's TI OMAP 2420. Also see: At least it seems that the TI OMAP is able to drive a 32 bit data path to the DDR-RAM. But, it says it has just 5 MBit internal framebuffer RAM. This are 5242880 bits, which is sufficend for 5242880 / 800 / 480 = 13,653... bits per pixel. Either has the N800 a dedicated display controller or only supports 12 bits/pixel. -Klaus -- Klaus Rotter * klaus <at> rotters <dot> de * www.rotters.de
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
- Next message: [maemo-developers] Re: [cairo] Cairo performance comparison, 770 / N800 / PXA-320
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]