[maemo-developers] [maemo-developers] N800 GUI Improvements from a Newton Developer's Perspective
From: Levi Bard taktaktaktaktaktaktaktaktaktak at gmail.comDate: Mon Jan 22 01:54:27 EET 2007
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] N800 GUI Improvements from a Newton Developer's Perspective
- Next message: [maemo-developers] N800 GUI Improvements from a Newton Developer's Perspective
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Before I made the site public, I thought I'd post it to the > developers' group and ask for some comments, agreements, and > disagreements. The site URL may change afterwards. > > http://cs.gmu.edu/~sean/stuff/n800/ Plenty of valid criticisms here (handwriting recognition, screen rotation, dearth of available specialized widgets), but I have to disagree on some points: * N800 should use a DB instead of a standard filesystem A lot of the power of this device is that it's Linux-based and that there are a huge selection of applications potentially available with a minimal amount of manual porting (Generally UI tweaks and performance hacks). Having a nonstandard backend would severely increase the work required to port an existing application, without something like a FUSE driver that would slow the system's performance, and many ported applications thus wouldn't be taking advantage of the db backend in that case. * N800 doesn't have powerful interapplication communication features Uhh...DBus? It's accessible from C and Python, the two most popular (so far) dev languages for the 770 and N800, and generally from nearly any language that's widely used for GNU/Linux development. * N800 apps should be able to move files around in the filesystem, instead of having to use the file manager IMO it makes more sense to have a file manager for the express purpose of manipulating the filesystem, rather than reimplementing that functionality (probably in a different way) for every client app. * N800 has too many triangle icons OK, this one is really reaching. Your basic issue with this seems to be that, taken out of context, a triangle doesn't really mean anything. Taken out of context, very few symbols mean anything. It's very standard to have arrow-shaped icons at the ends of scrollbars and combo boxes, and I don't really think diamond shapes, circles, or monkey heads would be inherently more intuitive. * N800 isn't enough like (Newton|OSX) I get it, you like the Newton and OSX. However, just because Newton or OSX do something a certain way, or have a certain icon to indicate a certain thing, and you've spent the last few years getting used to it, doesn't mean that the OSX way is objectively better, or that the Newton icon is inherently more intuitive. Surprise, a Linux/Gtk+-based tablet has a substantially different UI than a 10-year-old Apple product Overall, you made some good points, but it felt to me like they were semi-submerged within the general current of, "I'm angry because the N800 isn't a Newton with updated hardware and a stripped-down OSX." -- Just stop and take your secret journey, you will be a new box. --Leeta http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/shouldbefree.html
- Previous message: [maemo-developers] N800 GUI Improvements from a Newton Developer's Perspective
- Next message: [maemo-developers] N800 GUI Improvements from a Newton Developer's Perspective
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]