[maemo-developers] Firmware 4.2007.26-8 has inferior SDHC performance than 3.2007.10-7 - why?
From: Jesse Guardiani jesse at guardiani.usDate: Mon Jul 9 17:02:16 EEST 2007
- Previous message: Firmware 4.2007.26-8 has inferior SDHC performance than 3.2007.10-7 - why?
- Next message: Firmware 4.2007.26-8 has inferior SDHC performance than 3.2007.10-7 - why?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Neil MacLeod wrote: >> It may be that MMC speed is limited to 24Mhz (wonder what NB#54313 is >> about) for similar reason like N770 MMC speed being limited to 12Mhz - >> > > By the way, #54313 _is_ the MMC is bug #1204[1] in the public bugzilla (you can see this in the Alias field). So, the clock speed has been capped to prevent file corruption, but this clearly isn't the solution to the problem as it now appears to be worse than ever - I hope the solution won't be to cap the speed even lower. :( > > 1. https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1204 > Wow, that's some way scary stuff. I've got a 4gb SDHC card in my n800 and the patched kernel and I haven't had any corruption yet, thankfully (they're expensive!). Is this a maemo only thing? Or is everyone in the linux community experiencing the same issue? Could it be an issue with bad RAM on select n800s? When my RAM has gone bad in the past, I get disk corruption and all kinds of odd side effects. -- Jesse Guardiani Programmer/Sys Admin jesse at guardiani.us
- Previous message: Firmware 4.2007.26-8 has inferior SDHC performance than 3.2007.10-7 - why?
- Next message: Firmware 4.2007.26-8 has inferior SDHC performance than 3.2007.10-7 - why?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]