[maemo-developers] Firmware 4.2007.26-8 has inferior SDHC performance than 3.2007.10-7 - why?
From: Kees Jongenburger kees.jongenburger at gmail.comDate: Mon Jul 9 21:14:38 EEST 2007
- Previous message: Firmware 4.2007.26-8 has inferior SDHC performance than 3.2007.10-7 - why?
- Next message: Firmware 4.2007.26-8 has inferior SDHC performance than 3.2007.10-7 - why?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Wow, that's some way scary stuff. I've got a 4gb SDHC card in my n800 > and the patched kernel and I haven't had any corruption yet, thankfully > (they're expensive!). I guess the cards would not be lost , just the data. > Is this a maemo only thing? Or is everyone in the linux community > experiencing the same issue? > Could it be an issue with bad RAM on select n800s? When my RAM has gone > bad in the past, I get disk corruption and all kinds of odd side effects. But why would it be triggered now? Apparently it's not a bug that can easily be triggers by everybody. I have my rootfs running on sdhc with new "latest" release and I already filled it with 300MB of programs so far with no problems. greetings
- Previous message: Firmware 4.2007.26-8 has inferior SDHC performance than 3.2007.10-7 - why?
- Next message: Firmware 4.2007.26-8 has inferior SDHC performance than 3.2007.10-7 - why?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]