[maemo-developers] ARM/DSP power consumption
From: fireun ukobach fireun at gmail.comDate: Thu Sep 13 06:00:15 EEST 2007
- Previous message: ARM/DSP power consumption
- Next message: scratchbox and distutils.core problem not finding gcc properly
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On a similar note, what kind of latency via network response can I expect at the linux app level? The application in mind here is near real-time data collection and control. Accurate timing is more critical than low latency response. Is the api level clock accurate to the ms? better? Language best choice? thanks in advance, -=f On 9/12/07, Simon Pickering <S.G.Pickering at bath.ac.uk> wrote: > Hello all, > > This is probably a question for Nokia, though someone else may have looked into > it. > > Does anyone have figures for the power consumption of combinations of running > the DSP and the ARM? What I'd like to work out is whether the DSP could be used > for any old task (assuming it has the same or lower power consumption than the > ARM and the same or better performance) or whether it should be kept for those > tasks that require its specific abilities or just when the ARM needs to offload > some processing to keep responsive or to be able to decode large video, etc. > > Obviously the DSP processor is sitting there doing not a lot (unless one is > listening to music) for a lot of the time; what's the idle consumption compared > with the 100% load power consumption (if they are close it may as well be doing > work all the time, etc.)? > > Thanks, > > > Simon > > _______________________________________________ > maemo-developers mailing list > maemo-developers at maemo.org > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers >
- Previous message: ARM/DSP power consumption
- Next message: scratchbox and distutils.core problem not finding gcc properly
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]