[maemo-developers] Standardization of packages version name in the extra repositories

[From: Andrew Flegg]

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Jason Edgecombe
<jason at rampaginggeek.com> wrote:
>
> OK, so how do I handle the openafs and krb5 packages where there is an
> upstream debian package, but I didn't use it because the dependencies
> were so different?

Isn't that a canonical example of requiring a 'maemo' suffix?
Obviously "there's an upstream deb package" implies "...and its source
package was uploaded to the auto-builder to build the Maemo package."

Cheers,

Andreq

-- 
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/