[maemo-developers] maemo.org community leadership - the maemo.org Community Council
From: Allen Brown abrown at peak.orgDate: Sat Jun 14 21:25:44 EEST 2008
- Previous message: maemo.org community leadership - the maemo.org Community Council
- Next message: Howto debug a home applet on the device?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I think you will find that quarterly elections are too frequent. Everyone will burn out on voting. Yearly or by halves. -- Allen Brown http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown > Hey guys, > So Maemo, as we all feel has enormous potential and we all feel > investment in making things work out for the best. So instead of each > taking a side, why not find a better solution than what people are > envisioning from a position of separation. Because obviously there > are pros and cons to both scenarios. Direction given by passionate > members can help steer things in the right direction or stifle it (a > la gimp). And sometimes mob rule is horrible because there is no room > to innovate outside people's expectations. So obviously you are both > right here. Please don't bicker on the list, it brings the > conversation lower and turns a thread into a flame. I try to read all > of these mails and I prefer when things are in the positive. That's > what keeps me motivated and everyone motivated to contribute. Keeping > up morale is a big deal, especially in the floss world. What about a > democratically elected council that is renewed every quarter? Or > using a "flex/flow" organizational model like holacracy as I has put > forth for recommendation? I think roles are very important, and they > keep people focused and in the right kind of relationship with each > other. I like the idea of a dynamic social network of passionate > contributors, how can we create that? > > It's important to think about the "picture" of the future because then > we can all contribute to that picture. So why not paint the most > incredible thing we can envision and find out how to get there? > That's how scenario planners and futurists work with corporations. > And I think we can all recognize great products that come out of great > teams, and usually those teams are formed by a common context and > vision. > > Can't we all just get along? ;) > > -Paul > > > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Darius Jack <dariusjack2006 at yahoo.ie> > wrote: >> hi, >> >> you are completely wrong. >> I always and ever speak for myself. >> >> " >> >> he wants to speak for them all >> " >> NO NO NO >> (see above) >> >> There is a serious problem at maemo, as some guys from maemo >> don't need any community, any open discussion, any collaboration. >> What they need is power. >> >> Yesterday one guy from maemo said >> "communities need moderators" >> . >> Open free source software developers don't need moderators. >> What I develop and test is multitouch solutions, gesture recognition, >> new user-computer interfaces and the like. >> There is no place at maemo for such work, solutions. >> I tried to subscribe to developers section at Maemo 3 times >> and 3 times server generated nothing what could let me in. >> So I gave up, still working at some other places. >> I don't need moderators from maemo to control what I >> should work on. >> >> Managing Multimedia Magazines at Google >> I don't need third party moderators >> as it's me who can hold a position of a moderator. >> >> Fight for leadership at Maemo is what kills Maemo >> and any idea of Nokia to have Maemo to work >> for the benefit of Nokia. >> >> Get real man, there are hundreds of hot places globe-wide, >> you an develop your ideas, projects, solutions in nice >> association, no moderators, full democracy >> and you an still say NO for Maemo Community Council >> not hurting anyone. >> >> >> Darius >> http://groups.google.com/group/metallica4you/web/magazines?hl=en >> >> >> >> >> --- On Fri, 13/6/08, ed at okerson.com <ed at okerson.com> wrote: >> >> From: ed at okerson.com <ed at okerson.com> >> Subject: RE: maemo.org community leadership - the maemo.org Community >> Council >> To: maemo-developers at maemo.org >> Date: Friday, 13 June, 2008, 9:18 PM >> >>>> Any activities by communities financed, sponsored, donated by Nokia >>>> or other corporations, must follow the basic goal of the corporation. >>> >>> In general yes, and here the community adds value to Nokia. So there >>> should be no problem unless this is all simply a rant against >>> Nokia/commercial use of Linux, and in fact you had no intention of >>> giving any useful input to the questions that were posed? >> >> This does in fact appear to be a rant from Darius Jack. I have not >> found >> any references to anything he has contributed to any open source >> community, yet he wants to speak for them all. The relationship between >> commercial entities and the open source community has been explained to >> him more than once, but he does not care to understand. Time to flip >> the >> bozo bit. >> >> Ed >> Okerson >> >> _______________________________________________ >> maemo-developers mailing list >> maemo-developers at maemo.org >> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers >> >> Send instant messages to your online friends >> http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com >> _______________________________________________ >> maemo-developers mailing list >> maemo-developers at maemo.org >> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers >> >> > _______________________________________________ > maemo-developers mailing list > maemo-developers at maemo.org > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers >
- Previous message: maemo.org community leadership - the maemo.org Community Council
- Next message: Howto debug a home applet on the device?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]