[maemo-developers] Packaging Python Applications for Maemo: python-setuptools/eggs or PyPackager/debian?
From: Martin Grimme martin.grimme at gmail.comDate: Tue Mar 18 10:22:59 EET 2008
- Previous message: Packaging Python Applications for Maemo: python-setuptools/eggs or PyPackager/debian?
- Next message: radare 0.9.4 for maemo
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, definitely go the deb package way in maemo world. People will hate you if you only offer Python eggs for manual installation. You should keep using PyPackager, IMHO. Personally, I'm using a simple Makefile to satisfy the dpkg-buildpackage scripts for packaging my stuff for maemo. Just a few lines but it does its job. Cheers, Martin 2008/3/17, Darren Enns <darethehair at gmail.com>: > Forgive my likely confusion-of-terminology used in this email title :) > > Long story short: I have ported some python libraries to the Armel/maemo > platform, and had successfully used 'PyPackager' to create a nice > Debian-package for those to install with. > > When I asked the original coder for an opinion on this, he suggested > making an 'easy_install' (python-setuptools/egg?) instead. > > I am extremely ignorant about all of this stuff, and was quite content > to use 'PyPackager' to solve all of my problems -- plus, however > 'consistent' it may be in the Python world to use 'eggs' and stuff like > that, it seems to me that Debian packages allows people to install with > a GUI interface rather than a command-line one. > > Am I full of beans? Could anyone clarify these issues for me? > > Thanks > > Dare > _______________________________________________ > maemo-developers mailing list > maemo-developers at maemo.org > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers >
- Previous message: Packaging Python Applications for Maemo: python-setuptools/eggs or PyPackager/debian?
- Next message: radare 0.9.4 for maemo
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]