[maemo-developers] What category should network filesystems like OpenAFS go under?
From: Eero Tamminen eero.tamminen at nokia.comDate: Mon Oct 27 10:05:26 EET 2008
- Previous message: What category should network filesystems like OpenAFS go under?
- Next message: What category should network filesystems like OpenAFS go under?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, ext Andrew Flegg wrote: >> I need to upgrade the OpenAFS package. The package is in the >> "user/support" category. >> Is that the right category? It's a network filesystem. Should it be >> under support, network or some other category. Feedback on this or any >> other part of the package is welcome. > > This is currently in flux, see: > > https://wiki.maemo.org/Task:Package_categories > > The Maemo Packaging Policy does not currently have a "user/network" > category; the closest being "user/communication" or "user/support". > Neither fulfill the purpose very well (hence the new rationalisation). > > Personally, I'd stick with "user/support" for now and move it to a > better category when the new categories are decided upon. user/ category should be used only by packages that provide user something visible; has an UI, can be started from the applications menu etc. Anything else should come as dependencies of such packages or be installed with apt-get from command line. Maybe there could be additional developer/power-user category which visibility can be toggled from AM options (without resorting to the red-pill hack), but such packages shouldn't be visible by the default, they just confuse normal users. - Eero
- Previous message: What category should network filesystems like OpenAFS go under?
- Next message: What category should network filesystems like OpenAFS go under?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]