[maemo-developers] Maemo will switch (completely?) to Qt?
From: Kees Jongenburger kees.jongenburger at gmail.comDate: Mon Jul 6 21:25:54 EEST 2009
- Previous message: Maemo will switch (completely?) to Qt?
- Next message: Maemo will switch (completely?) to Qt?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Attila Csipa<maemo at csipa.in.rs> wrote: > On Monday 06 July 2009 17:23:25 Aniello Del Sorbo wrote: >> As much as I would love to learn Qt, I really hate C++. >> And I don't want to rely too much on Python. >> >> Also my personal interest in Maemo has been Xournal as eveyone knows, >> but if porting it to Qt involves learning C++.. brrr... > > The level of C++ required to do Qt is minimal, really, in fact, if you already > did GTK+, I'd go almost as far and say it's mostly simple syntax difference > (with the usual amount of C vs C++ compiler caveats, of course). That's one > of the reasons I feel C bindings never really took off for Qt. Of course if > you DO know C++, you'll be able to use Qt more efficiently. Note - I'm saying > this about using the toolkit from C or C++, there are differences between the > toolkits themselves, and these are FAR FAR bigger than using them from C or > C++. The Qt class library is really nice and certainly fun using. I think the abstraction level offered by QT and the different collection classes make it really usable. Indeed for most thing you don't really have to understand the every c++ feature. The example are very good, the documentation is excellent and the qtcreator gui combined with qmake takes the whole experience fun. I would be quite happy so see more Qt software around and would not be so sad to see gtk go. I am not affiliated with Qt. The One thing I really missed was proper gstreamer integration Greetings
- Previous message: Maemo will switch (completely?) to Qt?
- Next message: Maemo will switch (completely?) to Qt?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]