[maemo-developers] maemo-optify, autobuilder & /opt
From: Ed Bartosh bartosh at gmail.comDate: Mon Nov 2 10:20:50 EET 2009
- Previous message: maemo-optify, autobuilder & /opt
- Next message: maemo-optify, autobuilder & /opt
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2009/11/2 Marius Vollmer <marius.vollmer at nokia.com>: > ext Ed Bartosh <bartosh at gmail.com> writes: > >> So, I can see this way of implementing this: >> - give optification scripts to SDK developers and ask them to prepare >> Debian devkit for Fremantle with patched dpkg-buildpackage as fast as >> possible. > > We should prepare a concrete patch against dpkg-buildpackage, of course. > I will do that. > Please, use dpkg-buildpackage from the current devkit: http://scratchbox.org/download/files/sbox-releases/stable/src/scratchbox-devkit-debian-1.0.10.tar.gz > Would maemo-optify be part of that devkit as well, or would it be in the > rootstrap? > > I prefer to leave maemo-optify in the rootstrap: that way, we can update > it much easier, which is quite important at this stage. > Unfortunately it has to be part of the devkit. Otherwise it will behave differently with different rootstraps and make devkit inconsistent. >> - test new devkit with local builds and with autobuilder when it's ready. >> - distirbute devkit among developers and change SDK documentation for Fremantle. >> - deploy in autobuilder production > > If someone is willing and able to keep a close eye on the buildbot, then > we could deploy the devkit in the buildbot quite early. It might break > some builds, but if we are able to react quickly, then it is better to > catch those broken builds earlier than later. Ed? > Of course I'll take care of this. I can also help with building devkit if needed. What's the best way to make SDK guys to adopt our changes? Bug? -- BR, Ed
- Previous message: maemo-optify, autobuilder & /opt
- Next message: maemo-optify, autobuilder & /opt
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]