[maemo-developers] The issue of version strings
From: Aniello Del Sorbo anidel at gmail.comDate: Fri Nov 6 13:30:33 EET 2009
- Previous message: The issue of version strings
- Next message: The issue of version strings
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2009/11/6 Anderson Lizardo <anderson.lizardo at openbossa.org>: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Aniello Del Sorbo <anidel at gmail.com> wrote: >> Few people complained that Xournal 0.4.2.1-1fremantle13 was too long. >> I will make a diablo version as well (0.4.2.1-1diablo3). >> >> It's not my fault if Fremantle is a long name :P >> Anyway, suggestions? >> >> Bear in mind that 0.4.2.1-1fremantle13 is now in Extras, changing it >> will make it a new package? > > I personally think that the length of version strings should not be QA > or "user friendliness" issue at all. Ideally, I think the application > manager should handle long version strings by itself. One idea is to > truncate the middle of a long string with "...", like several > applications do to e.g. URLs. Some heuristic could be added that > splits into common separators, such as +-~: > > 2.0.0+cvs20040908+mp4v2+bmp-0ubuntu6maemo1 -> 2.0.0+...-0ubuntu6maemo1 > > (although I think that in this case "ubuntu6" should be removed from > the version string, given that the previous debian/changelog entries > will take care of documenting the upstream vendor versions.) > > And if strings like "0.4.2.1-1fremantle13", begin to become too long > for the UI to display properly, I think we might have a problem with > the application manager and not with the strings :) > > Just my two cents, > -- > Anderson Lizardo > OpenBossa Labs - INdT > Manaus - Brazil > The issue had more to do with that version appearing on Maemo.org Downloads than on the AM. Indeed it looks awful and I'd love to have a shorter version ON that web page. But if I change it by editing the Maemo.org page, it reverts back to the one in the package. I.e. I'd like to have my app version be shorter "0.4.2.1-<minor>" AND the 'package version' as it is now "0.4.2.1-1fremantle13". Is that possible at all? Thanks for your 2 cents :) -- anidel
- Previous message: The issue of version strings
- Next message: The issue of version strings
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]