[maemo-developers] The issue of version strings
From: Jeremiah Foster jeremiah at jeremiahfoster.comDate: Fri Nov 6 15:04:59 EET 2009
- Previous message: The issue of version strings
- Next message: The issue of version strings
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Nov 6, 2009, at 1:18, Aniello Del Sorbo wrote: > 2009/10/31 Jeremiah Foster <jeremiah at jeremiahfoster.com>: >>> >> >> Good points, but Ryan's original point is still valid and these >> issues >> also affect any place you have to use version numbers, not just the >> Application Manager. The string that Niels posted could be shortened >> to: 2.0.0-6maemo1 >> >> This leaves you with the version number of the upstream source, the >> version of upstream packaging, and the maemo packaged version. Here >> you have all the trackability you need with simplicity. I think the >> original request is a good one and developers/maintainers ought to >> consider revising their version strings for clarity. >> > > Few people complained that Xournal 0.4.2.1-1fremantle13 was too long. > I will make a diablo version as well (0.4.2.1-1diablo3). > > It's not my fault if Fremantle is a long name :P > Anyway, suggestions? > > Bear in mind that 0.4.2.1-1fremantle13 is now in Extras, changing it > will make it a new package? I think your version string is excellent, I wouldn't change a thing! You could, if you wanted, truncate the distro name into three letters; 0.4.2.1-1fre13 0.4.2.1-1dia3 But that is up to you. Jeremiah
- Previous message: The issue of version strings
- Next message: The issue of version strings
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]