[maemo-developers] Extras Testing to Extras, again...
From: Aniello Del Sorbo anidel at gmail.comDate: Thu Nov 19 16:14:28 EET 2009
- Previous message: Extras Testing to Extras, again...
- Next message: Extras Testing to Extras, again...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2009/11/19 Eero Tamminen <eero.tamminen at nokia.com>: > Hi, > > ext Aniello Del Sorbo wrote: >> >> I am sure I missed something... but what actions were taken to address >> this issue? > >> >> >> I do have Xournal pacakge 20 for more than 10 days with 6 thumbs up >> out of 10 (i.e. more than 50% of people voted OK). >> >> I want to promote it to Extras. >> And I don't want to depend on others. >> >> I REALLY would like to see a Promote to Extras earlier in the process. >> It's up to me to wait enough time so that people can test it. >> Again, what I think it's missing is something to vote after the >> packages has been promoted to Extras so that the bad ones can >> be pulled out. >> >> If the fear is for malicious applications, then there's no way we can >> prevent those from going to Extras no matter how many days >> it's been in Testing. >> (a timer comes to mind). > > I'm not really happy with this process either. > > There should be some kind of checklist which people go through, > that has items like: > > [x] Tested with "htop" + T (to sort output according to Time column) > to see that application doesn't wakeup on the background and when > screen is blanked (if the application time column doesn't > increase during 10 mins). CPU usage when application is visible, > but not interacting with the user could also be checked. > These require ssh connection to the device. > > [x] Checked normal application memory usage with mem-monitor > (from sp-memusage) on a freshly booted device and that it was > below X MB as required for this class of applications > (i.e. diff from before app started and when it is running). > > [x] Used application for few hours with endurance snapshots (tool > from sp-endurance package) being taken at regular intervals. > The report generated from this data didn't show any > (significant) resource leakage. > > Random comments about things working for people are not really > useful if at least someone of them hasn't checked properly also > things that aren't immediately visible to the user (effect on > battery usage and general device stability over longer period > of time etc). > > > - Eero > Can this be work for a Maemo Extras Testing Tester? :) -- anidel Sent from London, Eng, United Kingdom
- Previous message: Extras Testing to Extras, again...
- Next message: Extras Testing to Extras, again...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]