[maemo-developers] Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?
From: Kamen Bundev bundyo at gmail.comDate: Wed Oct 21 19:09:41 EEST 2009
- Previous message: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?
- Next message: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Welcome to the club :) I have the same problem. Regards: Bundyo On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Nathan Anderson <nathan at andersonsplace.net>wrote: > Devs, > > Ok, I have been trying to be a good boy and optify all the items I > have been putting into the fremantle extras. Up to now they have been > standalone libraries and the build bots have done their job and optified > the > package (and then I've been able to install them in my sdk properly). > > However, I have finally submitted a library which depends on two > other libraries that I did and optified. Well when it did the depends step > to pull all the libraries; this is the output: > > --- > Try to install static depends: libcurl3 libcurl3-dev libicu42 libicu42-dev > clucene-core clucene-core-dev zlib1g-dev python2.5 python2.5-dev > [2009-10-21 12:30:46] fakeroot apt-get -y -q -o > APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated=1 install --no-remove libcurl3 libcurl3-dev > libicu42 libicu42-dev clucene-core clucene-core-dev zlib1g-dev python2.5 > python2.5-dev </dev/null > .... (My depends are listed properly) .... > Unpacking libssl0.9.8 (from .../libssl0.9.8_0.9.8g-15maemo4+0m5_armel.deb) > ... > Selecting previously deselected package libreadline4. > Unpacking libreadline4 (from .../libreadline4_4.3-10.1+0m5_armel.deb) ... > Selecting previously deselected package clucene-core. > Unpacking clucene-core (from .../clucene-core_0.9.21b-0maemo1_armel.deb) > ... > dpkg: error processing > /var/cache/apt/archives/clucene-core_0.9.21b-0maemo1_armel.deb (--unpack): > trying to overwrite `/opt', which is also in package base-files > ^^^^ > Uhm, this is not good. Each of my "optified" packages throws this error. > That kinda makes optifing the libraries a pointless exercise if I can't use > them later in the buildbot. And Lib-icu is about 16 MEGS of libraries, so > I > would think it would be a great canidate for optification. Do I need to > resubmit everything w/o optification, or are the build bots broken? > > The packages that I have optified has depends on maemo-optify and has > "maemo-optify" as the step between (dh_gencontrol and dh_md5sums). > > dh_gencontrol > maemo-optify > dh_md5sums > > What do I need to do to solve this issue? I have no issues resubmitting > the packages I have done again to test things, but I would rather have a > "known" way to make it work since Lib-icu is a 2.5 hour (yes, 2 hours 30 > minutes) build process on the builders; so if I would prefer not to have to > tie up a buildbot for that length of time again until we have a known > working solution. > > Nathan. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > maemo-developers mailing list > maemo-developers at maemo.org > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20091021/4c943826/attachment.htm
- Previous message: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?
- Next message: Maemo-Optify & Builder Bots = Broken?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]