[maemo-developers] What's the best attack? (Re: How to use extras-testing correctly?)`
From: tero.kojo at nokia.com tero.kojo at nokia.comDate: Fri Sep 25 17:33:03 EEST 2009
- Previous message: Maemo (alpha) on Beagle: USB mouse
- Next message: What's the best attack? (Re: How to use extras-testing correctly?)`
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original message ----- > > I realise this is a slightly different question (hence the new subject) > > OK, say I have an evil twin who wants to attack ('own') a lot of Nokia N900 > devices. How do I do this? I hope that was retorical. Tell your evil twin to do something usefull. > Does extras-testing factor into this? At least so that I would prefer maemo.org extras to be clean from malware. It is much easier to promote it in Nokia internally when extras contains good software. Tero > David > > tero.kojo at nokia.com<mailto:tero.kojo at nokia.com> wrote: > > ----- Original message ----- > > > > > > On Thu, September 24, 2009 13:01, Aniello Del Sorbo wrote: > > > > > > > > > I am well aware of that :) > > > > > > But if I go thru extras-testing (and I really want to!) then it > > looks > > > > > > like the Community has the last word on my application. > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, they do. It's a community effort, but look at it from the other > > > > > side. Not one single person or entitiy can block your app. It > > takes more > > > > > people to block it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I know.. but still.. scares me.. :) > > > > > > > I tried to make this as transparent as possible, by showing each vote > > > together with the user. If people are trolling we should be easily be > > able > > > to spot this. > > > > > > By letting the community doing this QA out in the open, we can prevent > > > rejections without reasoning by a certain entity like we have seen in the > > > news lately. > > > > This transparency is actually the thing that makes me feel secure about > > the process. The testers are independent and operate with their own names. > > > > The (ex-)qa-manager in me is also excited by the fact that for once the > > testers are really independant. > > > > > However, in a democracy not everybody can be satisfied. Let's tackle > > > issues when we actually get there. > > > > Hear hear! > > If the process does not work, then it get's changed. If it works we'll > > just be happy and discuss how to make it more efficient. > > > > I'm already thinking that there might be a need for a Maemo testers' > > club that makes sure that even niche apps don't get stranded in testing. > > > > Also I'll take the time to ask Nokia testing to look at the tooling > > issue. I would like to have some nice set of tools for testing the > > measurable aspects of applications (like battery usage as Igor pointed > > out). > > > > And in any case we need to talk about Anidello's idea on feedback, with > > beer or not. > > > > Tero > > > -- > "Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..." > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20090925/51d465a5/attachment.htm
- Previous message: Maemo (alpha) on Beagle: USB mouse
- Next message: What's the best attack? (Re: How to use extras-testing correctly?)`
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]