[maemo-developers] rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
From: Andrew Flegg andrew at bleb.orgDate: Tue Feb 16 13:20:09 EET 2010
- Previous message: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Next message: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:17, Christopher Intemann <intemann at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Andrew Flegg <andrew at bleb.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:46, Christopher Intemann <intemann at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Of course, this would probably double the size of the rpm/deb, [...] >> >> ...and so the download. > > Yes, that's true, but since we're talking about mobile devices with > limited hardware, the apps are usually not that big anyways. I was just > thinking that the benefit would outbalance the size issue, at least as > long as we're talking about download sizes of one or two megabyte. Qt 4.6 and Python are *both* above the 30MB mark. > Sure, but is there a recent i386 port of Maemo at all? :-) Err, anyone who uses Scratchbox and develops on their PC rather than the device is running i386 Maemo. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/
- Previous message: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Next message: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]