[maemo-developers] rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
From: Laurent Desnogues laurent.desnogues at gmail.comDate: Tue Feb 16 13:23:39 EET 2010
- Previous message: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Next message: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Christopher Intemann <intemann at gmail.com> wrote: [...] > Apple had a great success story when they almost seamlessly switched > from PPC to Intel by introducing their universal binaries. That wouldn't work too well for ARM: you'd want ARMv6 with or without VFP, ARMv7-A with or without VFP + with or without NEON (and also with a poor VFP so that you should use NEON). Of course one can always hope dev's would select at runtime the fastest function for the platform, but that's only hope :-) Laurent
- Previous message: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Next message: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]