[maemo-developers] rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
From: Attila Csipa maemo at csipa.in.rsDate: Tue Feb 16 13:55:26 EET 2010
- Previous message: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Next message: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tuesday 16 February 2010 12:17:09 Christopher Intemann wrote: > common on netbooks. Of course, it is possible let the repository autodetect > the platform requesting a package and supply the matching one. On the other That is exactly how repositories in the debian world work for many years now :) > hand, Apple had a great success story when they almost seamlessly switched > from PPC to Intel by introducing their universal binaries. It's a different story. At the time of that switch, there was no central repository of software, so there was a need to make it possible for 3rd party developers to generate universal binaries and not futz with separate architectures. The concept of autobuilders and repositories makes this somewhat irrelevant - already, when you upload something to the autobuilder, it gets both ARM and X86 builds, regardless of what your original target or host machine was. Regards, Attila -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20100216/785f0d52/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Next message: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]