[maemo-developers] FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
From: Robin Burchell viroteck at viroteck.netDate: Wed Feb 17 15:21:15 EET 2010
- Previous message: FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Next message: FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Christopher Intemann <intemann at gmail.com> wrote: > Wouldn't it be thrilling to have this implemented in MeeGo? > http://icculus.org/fatelf/ What does this actually gain, as opposed to using binaries compiled for the specific platform? The only tangible benefit I can see is the ability to port from one arch to another easily, but that's hardly something that regular users are going to be doing. > Cheers, > > Chris Best, Robin Burchell mob: +447702671419 msn: msn at viroteck.net irc: w00t @ irc.freenode.net twr: http://twitter.com/w00teh
- Previous message: FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Next message: FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]