[maemo-developers] FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
From: Christopher Intemann intemann at gmail.comDate: Wed Feb 17 15:34:24 EET 2010
- Previous message: FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Next message: FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Robin Burchell <viroteck at viroteck.net>wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Christopher Intemann > <intemann at gmail.com> wrote: > > Wouldn't it be thrilling to have this implemented in MeeGo? > > http://icculus.org/fatelf/ > > What does this actually gain, as opposed to using binaries compiled > for the specific platform? The only tangible benefit I can see is the > ability to port from one arch to another easily, but that's hardly > something that regular users are going to be doing. > > Well I just find it nice to download a single software package, e.g. on the Nokia Booklet running MeeGo, and then later copy the same package to the N900 (which is also running MeeGo) and run it there. To make that possible, there either has to be a Booklet based on ARM architecture, an rpm carrying two platform specific versions of the software (e.g. ARM and Intel) or something like fatelf... Cheers, Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20100217/f6a6e666/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Next message: FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]