[maemo-developers] FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
From: Robin Burchell viroteck at viroteck.netDate: Wed Feb 17 15:37:38 EET 2010
- Previous message: FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Next message: FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:34 PM, Christopher Intemann <intemann at gmail.com> wrote: > Well I just find it nice to download a single software package, e.g. on the > Nokia Booklet running MeeGo, and then later copy the same package to the > N900 (which is also running MeeGo) and run it there. To make that possible, > there either has to be a Booklet based on ARM architecture, an rpm carrying > two platform specific versions of the software (e.g. ARM and Intel) or > something like fatelf... > Cheers, > Chris The thing is, as the note of FatELF says themselves, that it will require more space (to download & store), meaning you're pretty much no better off than having downloaded it twice in the first place. And again, considering that (for the *end user*, not people on this list..) this is probably not going to be such a common use case - that increased size is probably too much cost for little gain. Robin Burchell mob: +447702671419 msn: msn at viroteck.net irc: w00t @ irc.freenode.net twr: http://twitter.com/w00teh
- Previous message: FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Next message: FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]