[maemo-developers] Maemo QA process
From: Andrea Grandi a.grandi at gmail.comDate: Thu Jul 22 00:03:27 EEST 2010
- Previous message: Maemo QA process
- Next message: Maemo QA process
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, On 21 July 2010 22:53, Roman Morawek <lists at morawek.at> wrote: > Hello, > > I like to share my thoughts on the QA strategy of Maemo. > > I am the owner of an N900 program and promoted my package to > extras-testing ca. 2 months ago. Right now there are only 2 votes on it. > I wonder how many more months it will take until 10 persons vote for it > such that I can promote it to extras (given that the votes are positive). I've promoted a package to extras-testing too and in 3 days I've 0 votes. Other packages are having the same problem and I think that this is a real fail for Maemo users. I agree that we must ensure some quality to application distributed to end users, but this process must be improved as soon as possible because it doesn't work well. How to improve it? 1) Automatic promotion to maemo-extras if no one send a negative feedback within 10 days. 2) Immediatly promoted after 5 positive feedback. I think we should discuss this as soon as possible. Regards, -- Andrea Grandi email: a.grandi [AT] gmail [DOT] com website: http://www.andreagrandi.it PGP Key: http://www.andreagrandi.it/pgp_key.asc
- Previous message: Maemo QA process
- Next message: Maemo QA process
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]