[maemo-developers] External Repository and HAM
From: Attila Csipa maemo at csipa.in.rsDate: Mon Mar 8 21:30:11 EET 2010
- Previous message: Screenshots to user installable GUI packages in extras-testing [was Re: External Repository and HAM]
- Next message: External Repository and HAM
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Monday 08 March 2010 18:43:02 Graham Cobb wrote: > It must be made clear to testers that giving a thumbs down (or up) MUST > always be on the basis of their own, direct observation. It would be > unacceptable for a tester to give a thumbs down "because Attila has already > given a thumbs down and added a comment" as it is possible that you had > made a mistake, or it is possible that the developer has added a comment > which explains why the thumbs down was incorrect in this case. > > As long as each tester personally verifies that they can see that the > problem is there, and it is a showstopper, then it seems a reasonable > optimisation. Again, keep in mind that the issue here was with the bugtracker non- compliance, and that *IS* something that can be instantly verified (and I certainly don't expect anybody to t-down without making sure that a listed error actually exists - not that I'm that big of a factor in the testing-squad to expect anything from anybody :). In fact, if you take a look at my votes you'll see that I did not t-down mikkov's Kobo package even though many others did exactly because it was unclear to me whether it was offending the bugtracker rule or not. To reiterate an important point with the bugtracker issue - IMHO it should be editable from the packages user-interface (just like screenshots), and the XSBC field just used as a last-resort manual override. Think about it this way - the only way to change a bugtracker link is to force thousands of people to download the SAME package again (even if we forego the whole -testing issue), just so that a different link would appear on the maemo.org site ? MASSIVE overkill. And that's a two birds with one stone, right there - that would mean bugtrackers are no longer blockers, i.e. testers thumb down, the author fixes it in the package interface and the testers change it to thumbs up and it can be promoted, everybody happy, no quarantine or tester time wasted. Regards, Attila
- Previous message: Screenshots to user installable GUI packages in extras-testing [was Re: External Repository and HAM]
- Next message: External Repository and HAM
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]