[maemo-developers] External Repository and HAM
From: Valerio Valerio vdv100 at gmail.comDate: Mon Mar 8 21:59:15 EET 2010
- Previous message: External Repository and HAM
- Next message: External Repository and HAM
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Attila Csipa <maemo at csipa.in.rs> wrote: > On Monday 08 March 2010 18:43:02 Graham Cobb wrote: > > It must be made clear to testers that giving a thumbs down (or up) MUST > > always be on the basis of their own, direct observation. It would be > > unacceptable for a tester to give a thumbs down "because Attila has > already > > given a thumbs down and added a comment" as it is possible that you had > > made a mistake, or it is possible that the developer has added a comment > > which explains why the thumbs down was incorrect in this case. > > > > As long as each tester personally verifies that they can see that the > > problem is there, and it is a showstopper, then it seems a reasonable > > optimisation. > > Again, keep in mind that the issue here was with the bugtracker non- > compliance, and that *IS* something that can be instantly verified (and I > certainly don't expect anybody to t-down without making sure that a listed > error actually exists - not that I'm that big of a factor in the > testing-squad > to expect anything from anybody :). In fact, if you take a look at my votes > you'll see that I did not t-down mikkov's Kobo package even though many > others > did exactly because it was unclear to me whether it was offending the > bugtracker rule or not. > > To reiterate an important point with the bugtracker issue - IMHO it should > be > editable from the packages user-interface (just like screenshots), and the > XSBC field just used as a last-resort manual override. Think about it this > way > - the only way to change a bugtracker link is to force thousands of people > to > download the SAME package again (even if we forego the whole -testing > issue), > just so that a different link would appear on the maemo.org site ? MASSIVE > overkill. > > And that's a two birds with one stone, right there - that would mean > bugtrackers are no longer blockers, i.e. testers thumb down, the author > fixes > it in the package interface and the testers change it to thumbs up and it > can > be promoted, everybody happy, no quarantine or tester time wasted. > I totally agree with that approach, something similar to what Mikkov suggested. At least I don't see any use for the bugtracker outside the maemo.orgdomain(package interface&downloads), or I'm missing something here ? is there real value to have it embedded in the package ? any future plans for that ? Best regards, -- Valério Valério http://www.valeriovalerio.org > Regards, > Attila > > > _______________________________________________ > maemo-developers mailing list > maemo-developers at maemo.org > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20100308/10d0c9ac/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: External Repository and HAM
- Next message: External Repository and HAM
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]