[maemo-developers] Extras-testing improvements
From: Niels Breet niels at maemo.orgDate: Tue Mar 9 13:27:06 EET 2010
- Previous message: Extras-testing improvements
- Next message: MeeGo Metrics and Reporting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, March 9, 2010 11:19, Riku Voipio wrote: > On 03/09/2010 01:04 AM, ext Attila Csipa wrote: > >> I hope Valerio won't mind me taking the initiative here, but I'd like >> once again to underline the testing-squad is not the Spanish Inquisiton >> nor do we adhere to a dogma which makes testing procedures unchangeable >> (and we >> certainly don't want to create/impose them without a general consent). >> Many of >> the problems brought up have been met before, are already known and have >> been/are being worked on to make Extras-testing as painless as >> possible (and yes, I also personally have several packages in >> Extras-testing that make me >> curse at some of the current rules, so I know both sides of this >> occasionally painful story :). I invite everyone who has not alredy done >> so to take a good look at > >> http://wiki.maemo.org/Extras-testing/QA_Checklist/QA_Improvements >> > > From what I see, the problem is mostly that there is not enough > voters.. Well, there are probably lots of more people who add > extras-testing and even extras-devel to their devices and test random > applications from there, but can't bother to vote the maemo.org website. I > can see several reasons for this. > > 1) extras-testing voting is well hidden in maze of the website Yes, this probably needs to improve. Suggestions are welcome though. > 2) Once you find the place, you get an ugly list (especially if viewed > with n900): > http://maemo.org/packages/repository/qa/fremantle_extras-testing/ CSS is here: https://garage.maemo.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/midgard-data/style/maemo2009/static/css/packages.css?root=maemo2midgard&view=log Patches are appreciated, I'm not a designer by any means ;) > There is no correlation with packages you have actually installed on > your n900, so you need to browse around to actually find what to vote for. This is a harder part to solve, there is no way for the website to know what you have installed or not. > 3) the website kicks you out randomly > I noticed this too, need to find out why this happens. > > etc. no wonder we don't get many testers.. > > > But I think perhaps the website is the wrong place anyway. a > "extras-testing-assistant" application in extras that allows you to > add/remove extras-testing to application manager, shows a list of packages > installed from extras-testing and gives you a chance to thumb up/down. The appinstaller application might be a good candidate to add this testing and voting features to. It is currently in extras-devel and only using information from Downloads. But that can change of course. -- Niels Breet maemo.org webmaster
- Previous message: Extras-testing improvements
- Next message: MeeGo Metrics and Reporting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]