[maemo-developers] Why should I write apps for Maemo?
From: Nicola Mfb nicola.mfb at gmail.comDate: Fri May 7 13:49:46 EEST 2010
- Previous message: Why should I write apps for Maemo?
- Next message: Why should I write apps for Maemo?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:48 AM, <tero.kojo at nokia.com> wrote: [forwarding to the list too] On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 10:48 AM, <tero.kojo at nokia.com> wrote: [...] > Later on when 4.6 got final it might have made sense, but as Eero said, the release is based on quality and not calendar. And the 1.2 tree had moved forward a lot in that time. Good point, but it *seems* to be not coerent with the entire n900/maemo5 launch, that to many users *seems* was based on calendar (why a front camera without video calls? why skype video calls on pr 1.2 and not umts video calls? are they planned? should we wait for pr 1.3? or meego? but meego will run on n900? n900 is "as is", buy the next meego device for improvements, so why pr 1.2? and so on) *user opinions I gathered on maemo forum, do not blame me please* [...] > Because it would have to be tested to the same extent as the 1.2 image. And that is not a few days. You may have 3/4 blocker issues on not qt components, while qt may have passed all the QA tests some months ago, or at least is what I can perceive as there is no qt 4.6.2.1 or 4.6.3, but I'm an external guy so can only guess and ask. > Look, the N900 is a consumer electronics device. That means that normal people, like your mother, the guy you passed on the street and the person drinking coffee in a cafe use it. Those people cannot handle crashes and bad quality. It really is that simple. Again I have a different view, I'm not so sure that normal peoples know the word "maemo" or "meego" as they know "symbian" or "iphone", and at least here, in Italy, I do not know a single guy that buyed the n900 in a normal store, are it's rarely available, and the nokia market was focused on "free gps navigation" and "n97" (every single day on main tv!) so it seems not to be targeted to the mass. And, important, a lot of my friend (linux geeks) buyed the n900 from "poor mass market" guys that wanted to give it a try and after 2 weeks put it on e-bay becouse not complete on the phone/gps side. In every case this does not mean that quality is not important!, I want only to "communicate" as a community rappresentative, that there is a big (it may be very big) part of n900 users that are linux geeks and possible developers, and listing for their needs may be good for Nokia too. To fix the QA for normal peoples, and the bleeding needs of developers you have to provide them previews (it seems that qt-sdk, pr 1.2 sdk and meego already follows that line so it's not so absourd). In that way you'll assure a free (gratis) testers community while actually testing happens only inside to Nokia (that has to pay for that, while it wants to give more man power to meego), and you'll never get all the use cases that an entire community have. So, actually, when PR 1.2 will be released if an hided one-line-commit-to-fix bug will come out, we have to wait again for 3/4 months to have it fixed and pass all the qa tests again, while it may be discovered before by the community on the preview images. But I may be totally wrong about that, in that case ignore all my words :) Going positive, I understand that the community stress is at least comparable to the one of nokia developers and administrators, so really hoping you the best in these hot days! Regards Niko
- Previous message: Why should I write apps for Maemo?
- Next message: Why should I write apps for Maemo?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]