[maemo-developers] adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
From: Andrew Flegg andrew at bleb.orgDate: Wed Jan 26 15:39:12 EET 2011
- Previous message: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
- Next message: R: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 13:18, Roman Morawek <lists at morawek.at> wrote: > > I just want to remark, that this proposal would not change anything in > my specific situation. I'm not listed in the top-products-karma-page and > would still need 10 votes, which seems to take very long time. Indeed. This is, however, what the "super-testers" are supposed to address. > Maybe another solution is to have a higher weight on the votes > themselves. E.g. each thump up/down has a weight of > <voter's karma>/100+1? > It would still need 10 voters with low karma but a single "super guru" > could just release a package. This is "super-testers", albeit more fine-grained. They exist now, perhaps they're not widely deployed enough or it's too fine-grained... Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew at bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/ Maemo Community Council member
- Previous message: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
- Next message: R: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]