[maemo-developers] Woodchuck package review
From: Neal H. Walfield neal at walfield.orgDate: Sat Nov 5 14:50:00 EET 2011
- Previous message: tablet-browser-view-test source is now available
- Next message: Woodchuck package review
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi, All, I'd like to upload Woodchuck to extras. Woodchuck is stable and usable and I think that it offers great value to users of mobile devices. Since my favorite programs are now Woodchuck-enabled, I've observed a change in my behavior. Because, gPodder, FeedingIt and Khwetteur automatically download content, I rely a lot less on my cellular provider, and, since the data I want is already there, the content is more quickly available and poor cellular coverage rarely bothers me. To get Woodchuck into extras, I need 6 people to review the packages. Here are the links to the packages: http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/murmeltier/0.4~20111102-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/pywoodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/smart-storage-logger/0.4~20111102-7/ http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/libgwoodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/ Thanks for your help! Neal
- Previous message: tablet-browser-view-test source is now available
- Next message: Woodchuck package review
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]