[maemo-developers] Woodchuck package review

[From: andrew at bleb.org]

For the packahes which aren't in "Section: user/..." they will be promoted automatically as dependencies of things which relu on them.

I haven't checked your packages yet, but that should reduce the review burden.

Hope that helps,

Andrew

-- 
Andrew Flegg | mailto:andrew at bleb.org -- http://www.bleb.org/On 05/11/2011 12:50 Neal H. Walfield wrote:
Hi, All,

I'd like to upload Woodchuck to extras.  Woodchuck is stable and
usable and I think that it offers great value to users of mobile
devices.  Since my favorite programs are now Woodchuck-enabled, I've
observed a change in my behavior.  Because, gPodder, FeedingIt and
Khwetteur automatically download content, I rely a lot less on my
cellular provider, and, since the data I want is already there, the
content is more quickly available and poor cellular coverage rarely
bothers me.

To get Woodchuck into extras, I need 6 people to review the packages.
Here are the links to the packages:

  http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/murmeltier/0.4~20111102-7/
  http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/pywoodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/
  http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/apt-woodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/
  http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/smart-storage-logger/0.4~20111102-7/
  http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/libgwoodchuck/0.4~20111102-7/

Thanks for your help!

Neal
_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers at maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers