[maemo-users] Microb Versus Mozilla Fennec
From: Aniello Del Sorbo anidel at gmail.comDate: Fri May 9 17:50:54 EEST 2008
- Previous message: Microb Versus Mozilla Fennec
- Next message: Microb Versus Mozilla Fennec
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
That's weird, MicroB opens my Google Reader page with no issue at all, and is actually quite fast. -- anidel On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Jonathan Greene <atmasphere at atmasphere.net> wrote: > I love the Fennec browser though it could clearly use less memory, be > more stable and launch more quickly. ;) > > It can actually render my Google Reader page which MicroB cannot ... I > find it super responsive and hope we see it packaged in a future > release. What I understood from the original Ars piece on the topic > was that they are pretty close relatives, but that Fennec benefits > from a later code base which seems to really make quite the > difference. > > For every day use though I am running MicroB as it is far more > reliable at the moment. > > JG > > On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Quim Gil <quim.gil at nokia.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > ext John Holmblad wrote: > >> All, > >> > >> for those who have not already seen the article whose url is: > >> > >> > >> > http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080409-first-look-mozilla-fennec-targets-handheld-browser-market.html > >> > >> It provides a comparison of the performance of Microb versus Fennec on > >> the N810. Fennec shows a ~6x speed improvement for javascript. > > > > Yes, the numbers of these automated tests are right. However, users > > having used both browsers will probably agree that in terms of real user > > experience as for today both are pretty similar, and even the Nokia > > version is performing better in real use conditions. I'm talking about > > my own experience and comments I've heard. > > > > What is your opinion? I'm sure both Nokia and Mozilla developers are > > interested to know. > > > > Is someone lying? Not at all. It's just a matter of looking at the > > details. The current MicroB engine was developed one year ago by Nokia > > starting with a pre-alpha of the latest Gecko engine, the freshest code > > available by then. The release under development done last Summer put a > > Mozilla based browser at a level where nobody could before (including > > the own Mozilla guys, who were happily surprised btw). Now Fennec is > > shipping a most recent Gecko and of course putting both one by side you > > get nowadays much better performance at engine level. How much MicroB's > > open source code helped on that, I don't know but I guess it saved them > > some work. > > > > But users don't deal with engines alone, you have the UI in between and > > this is where the Mozilla browser in Chinook and Fennec differ most: the > > first uses an own UI providing -as for today- much better performance > > that XUL, a component that seems like needing more work before being > > really fit in mobile devices. Are we going to keep this difference in > > the future? Time we tell. Both teams have a lot of work to do anyway. > > > > But in fact the best part of this Mozilla browsers comparison is not the > > numbers competition part but the human collaboration part. The Mozilla > > and Nokia developers are collaborating and both projects are in sync. > > The current development of the Mozilla browser for Diablo+1 is based > > directly on the Gecko trunk and we are discussing ways of deepening the > > collaboration, also at a community level. Imagine the wide community of > > Firefox add-on developers targeting the maemo platform - that would be > fun. > > > > We are even having some common exercises of exploration, both sides > > learning a lot i.e. Qt support - > > http://blog.vlad1.com/2008/05/06/well-isnt-that-qt/ > > > > Conclusion: We are as happy as you seeing the performance progress done > > by the Fennec project. We feel honored by them targeting our platform in > > the first place. Nokia is doing the right thing with the Mozilla > > development. Lots of potential for collaboration and cool stuff. > > > > -- > > Quim Gil > > marketing manager, open source > > maemo software @ Nokia > > _______________________________________________ > > maemo-users mailing list > > maemo-users at maemo.org > > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users > > > > > > -- > Jonathan Greene > +1.914.750.8740 > AIM / iChat - atmasphere > gtalk / jabber - jonathangreene at gmail.com > Skype / Gizmo - JonathanGreene > blogs - http://www.atmasphere.net/wp / http://www.maemoapps.com > _______________________________________________ > maemo-users mailing list > maemo-users at maemo.org > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users > -- anidel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-users/attachments/20080509/94d08160/attachment.htm
- Previous message: Microb Versus Mozilla Fennec
- Next message: Microb Versus Mozilla Fennec
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]