[maemo-users] OS Stability
From: Mark wolfmane at gmail.comDate: Thu Dec 3 00:22:25 EET 2009
- Previous message: OS Stability
- Next message: bluetooth keyboards and N900
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Thomas Waelti <twaelti at gmail.com> wrote: <snip> > I would say the Maemo pattern has followed the Symbian pattern quite "well", including the maturity of the released software (first initial firmwares with some bugs, more mature releases with additional features later on: see Chinook > Diablo). <snip> I'm afraid you are giving the wrong example there, as Diablo is several steps backward from Chinook. Chinook supports the (N800) hardware better than and is every bit as stable as Diablo, at least for me. I'm going back to Chinook ASAP. Symbian evolved from Epoch, which is the OS on my Psion Series 5. Psion first dropped hardware production and became a software-only company (renaming Epoch to Symbian and developing it far past the original capabilities of Epoch and licensing it to companies producing smartphones and PDAs), then sold off the OS to somebody else (Nokia?), and now has become "Psion Teklogix" (presumably by acquiring Teklogix) and is producing niche handhelds running Windows CE, of all things. Mark
- Previous message: OS Stability
- Next message: bluetooth keyboards and N900
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]