[maemo-users] oh 3g, 3g, wherefore art thou 3g
From: Hartti Suomela hartti at gmail.comDate: Mon Feb 28 19:51:30 EET 2011
- Previous message: oh 3g, 3g, wherefore art thou 3g
- Next message: Pulseausio allocating +40Mo of RAM ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
There are two main GSM operators in U.S: T-Mobile and AT&T. They use different bands for 3G. N900 can connect with 3G when in T-Mobile network but not when in AT&T network. You can find the bands used by the two operators on these wikipedia pages http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-Mobile_USA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT&T_Mobility Also I am pretty sure that there is no special N900 HW for US markets. The same HW is used all around the world (although I seem to have forgotten already a lot of the N900 technical details...) Hartti On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail < francisco.diaztrepat at gmail.com> wrote: > I really don't understand I have the US version of the N900 as far as > I know (told me so the guy from whom I bought the phone) and it seems > the us doesn't have 2100. > > weird > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail > <francisco.diaztrepat at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yeah I kind of thought that was the case. What is weird is that 3g is > > already running in the US and for the table at the article it seems > > Argentina has the same bands. > > > > The ones that differ a lot are the European ones, Italy and UK for > instance. > > > > So no problem, I would just need to move there.... :-) > > > > Italy was so nice last september, I could live there and eat focaccias > > and prosciutto... > > > > f(t) > > > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Lasse Latva <llatva at iki.fi> wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011, Alejandro López wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Momento que soy lento (Homer, Latam edition) > >>>> > >>>> EGSM 1900 is not the 3g 1900MHZ of Personal Carrier? > >>> > >>> As far as I understand. EGSM means "Extended GSM" and is what you see > as > >>> 2.5g. > >> > >> Sorry that I post into a thread that is going littlebit off-topic, > but... > >> > >> E-GSM is actually extension to the GSM frequency range, please see e.g. > >> > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-GSM#E-GSM > >> > >> So it doesn't increase the nominal user data rates but gives operators > >> more channels to expand their GSM network. AFAIK, "2.5G" usually refers > to > >> GSM/EDGE (EGPRS) services: better than 2G (GPRS) but less than 3G. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> > >> -- > >> Lasse Latva > >> http://www.iki.fi/~llatva > >> _______________________________________________ > >> maemo-users mailing list > >> maemo-users at maemo.org > >> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users > >> > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > maemo-users mailing list > maemo-users at maemo.org > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-users/attachments/20110228/15d9e8a3/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: oh 3g, 3g, wherefore art thou 3g
- Next message: Pulseausio allocating +40Mo of RAM ?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]