[maemo-community] Copyright (was Re: Why not release the new site)

From: Tim tim at samoff.com
Date: Fri Feb 27 16:24:51 EET 2009

(I'd vote for 'attribtion no-deriv'.)


On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:39:14 +0200
Quim Gil <quim.gil at nokia.com> wrote:

> ext Andrew Flegg wrote:
> >>> Copyright (c) 2002-2009 Nokia Corporation
> >> To what? :)
> What about a footer inspired by the one at
> http://creativecommons.org ?
> "Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is
> licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License"
> If there is Nokia copyrighted content under maemo.org it is the task
> of the related Nokia owners to state that in the relevant pages.
> Since the norm is not to have such type of content in maemo.org,
> there is no need for a mention in the home or every single page.
> How really relevant is to state the 2002-2008 period in any case? To
> start with, was it there any maemo.org on 2002?
> And in a project like maemo.org, what is the big interest pushing a
> "(c)" compared to a much more appropriate CC logo and notice?

More information about the maemo-community mailing list