[maemo-community] Election announcement article (formatting & questions)
From: Sunny B sunnyb7532 at gmail.comDate: Fri Aug 19 16:16:38 EEST 2011
- Previous message: Election announcement article (formatting & questions)
- Next message: Election announcement article (formatting & questions)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Graham Cobb <g+770 at cobb.uk.net> wrote: > On Friday 19 August 2011 03:51:17 Sunny B wrote: > > Agreed. The referendum is rather open-ended and permits a variety of > > governance options. Deriving from your comment earlier, the current > > referendum wording "authorizes" the council so the objections to binding > > nature are no longer on point. > > Is there somewhere I should be looking to see the latest proposed draft of > the > referendum question? The question should be comprehensively discussed on > this > list before issuing it and you are proposing to issue it on Monday, I > think? > The issue is also being addressed on the forum, even though that may not be the preferred mechanism for some of us. http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=75863 Here is the referendum: "Should the Community Council be authorized to form a governance structure which sees the continued support of maemo devices and survival of maemo-based and derived open source software even without Nokia involvement? [ ] Yes [ ] No" I am keen that it very clearly and very simply allows the community to > express > its wish as to whether or not it wishes to see substantial effort going > into > maintaining the Maemo infrastructure (in particular, builds, repositories, > bugzilla, etc) or whether it believes it is appropriate for the community > to > revert to being just a forum, a wiki and a collection of enthusiasts with > their own application repositories. > I do not think that there is any suggestion that some sort of forum, wiki > and > mailing lists would not remain -- many individuals would be happy to host > those. There is that and more. If you have not seen it, a *current *council > member wanted to wind down maemo when Nokia funding ends and transition it > to meego.com. I called for a community vote. The council member then > starts "the end is coming" forum thread in which he says "the Maemo > community is (almost) nothing without Nokia" and proposes to wind down > maemo after Nokia funding ends and transition it into meego.com. I > proposed the referendum above so the community could decide for itself. > > The question needs to be very clearly about whether there is a goal to > maintain the complex and expensive infrastructure. I wish the question > could be of that type because that it is the difficult issue to be decided. > But the referendum was meant to decide the *current* impasse where some no > longer support maemo and others want there to be a community-governed > organization independent of Nokia. > > Keep the question simple and clear. If the answer is yes, the council will > have the job of working out what the solution is (and I, personally, would > be > keen to vote for people who commit to having a full discussion of the > proposed > solution on this list). If the answer is no, I guess the council will > probably voluntarily disband itself. I am like minded. I have already > indicated that if the answer is no, then I will be abide by the decision if > I am a council member next term. However, others have implied that they > will disregard the community vote. Please make suggestions to the working > if you think the referendum can be improved. > > Graham > > Rob Bauer -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-community/attachments/20110819/18a305a1/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: Election announcement article (formatting & questions)
- Next message: Election announcement article (formatting & questions)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]